Home About Services Use Cases Resources Blog FAQ Book a Demo
← Back to resources

Authentication and Authorization Policy

An authentication and authorization policy where every access rule is a recorded decision

SCSecurity AnalystStandard tier, signal-activated9 sections

An authentication and authorization policy states how sure the system must be that a user is who they claim, and what each role may do once inside. It fixes the assurance level, the role list, the role-based access control (RBAC) matrix, the session limits, the password rules, multi-factor authentication (MFA) per role, single sign-on (SSO) federation, API key handling and the guards against privilege escalation. With it, a team can decide who gets which access, and defend that decision to an auditor.

Hand-written policies drift into defaults. Someone copies a template, keeps the sample timeouts, and nobody records why the admin role has a wildcard. Six months later the leaver path has no owner, the API keys never rotated, and the audit asks a question nobody can answer. The document reads fine; it just does not describe a decision anyone made.

What sections does an authentication and authorization policy contain?

Specira's governed default template produces nine sections, each with a production strategy, the decisions it requires and the evidence it must cite.

SectionDepthHow it is produced
Authentication MethodcoreProse synthesized from discovery
Role ListcoreTable from typed items · Role, Description, User Count
Full RBAC MatrixstandardTable from typed items · Role, Entity, Create, Read, Update, Delete
Session PolicystandardProse synthesized from discovery
Password PolicystandardProse synthesized from discovery
MFA Requirements per RolefullProse synthesized from discovery
SSO/OIDC ConfigurationfullProse synthesized from discovery
API Key ManagementfullProse synthesized from discovery
Privilege Escalation PreventionfullProse synthesized from discovery

How does Specira build the authentication and authorization policy?

The Security Analyst owns this artefact. Before it asks a single question, it reads the regulatory obligations, security constraints and governance policies already in the knowledge base, so the assurance level it proposes is anchored to the highest data classification a session touches rather than to a default. In the sample, section 1 (Assurance Levels) shows that anchor as a table, with the decision recorded against a named approver and a date. Section 2 (Authentication Strategy) turns credential rules into numbers (password length, lockout, recovery path) and retires periodic rotation as a stated decision. Section 4 (Permission Model) records why role-based access control won over relationship-based and attribute-based alternatives, then lays out the matrix with explicit cells only and no wildcard admin row.

The Red Team Critic reviews every turn, so a session policy that contradicts a data classification, or a leaver path with no owner, gets flagged before it reaches the document. Sections whose decisions are still open render as named gaps; Specira never invents a timeout to fill a cell. Every row carries provenance: who decided, when, and on what evidence, with knowledge base citations scored for confidence. The export gate measures decisions resolved, not pages written, and the deferred decisions ship listed in a gap report alongside the DOCX, Markdown and JSON exports, or the push to Confluence, Jira, GitHub or Linear.

First page of the sample: Authentication and Authorization Policy

Rendered sample

Rendered from the Specira governed default template on a fictional company, watermarked, with its diagrams. Read it in the browser or take the PDF.

PDFView online

How do teams use the authentication and authorization policy?

What does the policy look like inside Specira?

These screens show the discovery session where the assurance level was argued, the typed decisions behind the matrix, and the export gate for this policy.

Screens are from a seeded Specira demo workspace; counts and scores are sample data.

Book a demo and watch the Security Analyst anchor an assurance level to your data classification in one session.

Book a Demo

What do teams ask about this artefact?

Authentication answers whether the person is who they claim; authorization answers what they may do once identified. The policy handles both: assurance level, factors and session rules for the first, the role list and the role-based access control (RBAC) matrix for the second. Keeping them in one governed document keeps the session rules consistent with the permissions they protect.
The governed template asks for the authenticator assurance level and for session and password parameters expressed as numbers within the ceilings that National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-63B defines: absolute and idle timeouts, minimum length, breached-password screening, and no periodic expiry. The Security Analyst reads any stricter obligation from your knowledge base first.
Yes, as a structured table compiled from the roles and entities typed during discovery. Each role-based access control (RBAC) cell is explicit, wildcard admin cells are rejected by the template's validators, and hub or ownership scoping is stated as a server-enforced rule. If a role's permissions were never decided, that row renders as a named gap rather than a guess.
The multi-factor authentication (MFA) section lists which roles require a second factor, which factors are accepted (with phishing-resistant options where feasible), and which sensitive actions trigger a step-up. In the sample, the absence of step-up at pilot is itself recorded as a decision, so a reviewer knows it was considered, not forgotten.
It is available from the standard tier upward. It cross-references the security requirements document and the threat model, so the three artefacts share identifiers: a session rule in the policy cites the requirement row that enforces it and the threat it answers. Templates can be cloned and adjusted in the Templates module if your organization needs extra sections.

Which artefacts go with this one?