Home About Services Use Cases Resources Blog FAQ Book a Demo
← Back to resources

Infrastructure and Deployment Spec

An infrastructure and deployment spec template an assessor can evaluate without opening another file

SASolutions ArchitectStandard tier, signal-activated8 sections

An infrastructure and deployment spec template records how a system is actually run: the hosting choice and its alternatives, the environments, the continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline, the container strategy, domains and certificates, the infrastructure-as-code (IaC) outline, the blue/green deployment approach and the cost per environment. It lets a team decide that the operational realization matches the architecture's boundaries and the security requirements. Specira compiles it from the discovery session's constraints, decisions and named integrations, and cites each one.

Hand-written infrastructure documents name a platform class and stop. 'Managed containers in the cloud' cannot be assessed: which region, why that region, what authenticates each caller, what actually moves on each arrow. Those facts live in a wiki page, a Terraform repository and someone's head, and they drift apart within a sprint. When the compliance assessor asks where technician location data rests, three answers come back.

What sections does the infrastructure and deployment spec template contain?

The governed default template fixes eight sections. The environment list and the cost estimate are tables built from typed items; the rest is prose synthesized from discovery decisions and constraints.

SectionDepthHow it is produced
Hosting ChoicecoreProse synthesized from discovery
Environment ListcoreTable from typed items · Environment, Purpose, URL
CI/CD PipelinestandardProse synthesized from discovery
Container StrategystandardProse synthesized from discovery
Domain ConfigurationstandardProse synthesized from discovery
IaC OutlinefullProse synthesized from discovery
Blue/Green DeploymentfullProse synthesized from discovery
Cost Estimate per EnvironmentfullTable from typed items · Environment, Service, Monthly Cost

How does Specira build the infrastructure and deployment spec?

The Solutions Architect agent owns this artefact, with the Security Analyst's requirements feeding the authentication and encryption columns. It compiles the document from the session's typed constraints, resolved decisions and named integrations. The sample shows the mechanism. Hosting Strategy records the decision as what, why considered, who and how, then states the re-decision triggers as conditions rather than dates, and confirms that every secret is sourced from configuration, never code. Network Topology names the actual provider and region, gives the data residency justification with the security requirement it satisfies, and becomes the project's infrastructure register: a node table where each node states what it runs on, how callers authenticate and the highest data class it holds, and an edge table where each arrow lists the actual payload fields, the protocol and the encryption. The architecture owns the logical boundaries; this artefact realizes them and cites them.

The Red Team Critic consults on every turn and runs the export readiness gate, which measures resolved decisions rather than pages. A blue/green section whose rollback decision is still open renders as a named gap, never as a generic playbook. Every row carries provenance: who decided, when, on what evidence, and knowledge base entries such as regulatory obligations and integration contracts are matched with a confidence score and cited. Export as DOCX for assessors, Markdown or JSON for agents, or push to Jira, Confluence, GitHub or Linear. This artefact is available from the Standard tier, and the template can be cloned and adjusted in the Templates module.

First page of the sample: Infrastructure and Deployment Spec

Rendered sample

Rendered from the Specira governed default template on a fictional company, watermarked, with its diagrams. Read it in the browser or take the PDF.

PDFView online

How do teams use the infrastructure and deployment spec?

What does the infrastructure artefact look like in Specira?

The screens below show the Solutions Architect and Security Analyst resolving hosting decisions in a session, the rendered topology register, and the export gate for this artefact.

Screens are from a seeded Specira demo workspace; counts and scores are sample data.

Book a demo and see a discovery session become an infrastructure and deployment spec your assessor can sign off.

Book a Demo

What do teams ask about this artefact?

It is a structured document that fixes the hosting choice, the environment list, the continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline, the container strategy, domain and certificate configuration, the infrastructure-as-code (IaC) outline, the blue/green deployment approach and the cost per environment. Specira's version adds a topology register with node and edge tables that name authentication, encryption and payload fields.
The architecture owns the logical boundaries and the container view; the infrastructure and deployment spec realizes them on a named provider, region and set of services. The spec cites the architecture's boundary decisions instead of re-deciding them, and the security requirements it satisfies are cited row by row, so an assessor can read one artefact and follow every reference.
The section renders as a named gap. The governed template requires a logged hosting decision with the alternatives considered and the re-decision triggers stated as conditions; until that decision is resolved in the session, the Red Team Critic's export gate lists it in the gap report rather than letting a placeholder platform ship.
Yes. The network topology section requires the provider and region to be named, not just a platform class, and requires the region to carry a residency justification tied to the regulatory obligation or contract clause it satisfies. In the sample, personal location data is kept in a Canadian region by placement, which the template treats as stronger than a policy.
DOCX for assessors and operations, Markdown and JSON for agents, and a zip per session or project, plus pushes to Jira, Confluence, GitHub and Linear. Every row keeps its provenance: who decided, when, on what evidence. Deferred decisions ship listed in the gap report, and the sample on this page is watermarked and rendered on a fictional company.

Which artefacts go with this one?